I experienced quite the variety of cars during the madness that we call SEMA week. I started the week off in a Rolls Royce Phantom, which could quite possibly be the perfect car for a 4-person road trip to Vegas. Never before has 4 hours gone by so quickly. Then, while working for the Top Gear Taxi Service, I spent 8 hours a day driving the 620 horsepower Firebreather Camaro, giving rides to excited Top Gear fans for the entire SEMA week, all the while experiencing massive discomfort from the Camaro’s low roofline, poor seating angle, and heavy clutch in traffic. The day after the show ended, I had to be in Phoenix for another shoot, so I rented the only car available on the lot: a base-level Nissan Versa. While we’ve established the Versa is a very practical car for the money, when you have a bad back, a bad knee, and a bad elbow, this econobox is just about the worst place you’d want to be for a 5 hour drive through the desert. It’s small, wheezy, doesn’t have enough power to make a solid pass on a 2-lane road, and lacks a center arm rest, something I never knew how much I appreciated in other cars. Fortunately, I had an upgrade waiting.
Tom had driven out from LA to meet me in Phoenix in our subject vehicle, the Cadilac CTS Sport Wagon 3.6. Tom’s a pretty hard sell, rarely interested in “everyday” cars, so when he showed up at the hotel in Phoenix, excited about driving the non ‘V’ model ‘Lac, my interest was piqued. Especially since we’d have to spend another full two days in the car, using it as a camera vehicle in Arizona before embarking on a 500 mile road trip home.
I don’t know why American’s haven’t really gotten behind wagons as much as Europeans do. They drive essentially the same as the sedans on which they are based, and haul more stuff. From the driver’s seat, you’d never know the difference, and sometimes, as in the case with Volvo, Audi, and yes, Cadillac, they look better than their D-pillarless counterpart. There is one downside to a wagon though: weight. While we didn’t do any performance testing of our specific model, Car and Driver did test the wagon last year, and found that its added heft hurt acceleration to the tune of a full second to sixty. Now, 7 seconds isn’t exactly sluggish, but 6 seconds feels noticeably quicker. Since the only CTS sedan I’ve ever piloted was a ‘V,’ I expected this car to be slower and didn’t notice the difference of the added weight. Nevertheless, once rolling, the optional 3.6L, 304 hp V6 provides more than enough thrust for all but the most demanding drivers. Its soundtrack isn’t as slick as BMW’s straight-sixes, but overall its quiet and free of vibration. Multi-car passes on remote desert byways were just a left-paddle click away, and sustaining triple digit speeds over long distances remains so smooth, I was able to sleep in the passenger seat while Tom ate up hundreds of miles.
But without the monster LSA engine underhood to wow us, we focused on the interior and ride quality, the two most important factors on a long road trip. Cadillac gets an A++ for the CTS’s seats, the first set I’ve seen from an American car that properly mimics Benz and BMW’s tightly wrapped leather. Most American cars, especially previous generation Cadillacs and all Corvettes, have “baggy” leather, which is comfortable, but gets deformed and wrinkled after just a few thousand miles. The firm, supportive, and comfortable seats in the CTS tell me that GM has been studying Ze Germans, and copying them properly, for once. Both front and rear seat legroom is best in class, and the front passenger seat can be moved so far back that even my long legs won’t be able to reach the end of the footwell. When reclined it’s like flying British Airways, first class. Most importantly, fit and finish are top notch and give up nothing to the Germans. In fact, I know of three people who have traded in their 3-series BMW’s for CTS 3.6’s and never looked back.
Our fully-loaded test vehicle came with every option box ticked, save for the full glass roof, and technology in the CTS is plentiful, without being excessive. The retractable multimedia touch screen is bright and simple to use, though we wish that some basic navigation information were accessible while the screen was lowered. The audio system is intuitive and sounds great even at high volume levels. My personal favorite option box, heated/cooled seats work great for a desert road trip, where the seats tend to get extremely hot while parked in the sun.
There was a time when American car companies tried to offer the same features as the German manufacturers, but at a discounted price. How did they get to that price? By sacrificing fit, finish, and build quality. Think of a decade ago, when the Catera, based on an Opel, was as German as a Cadillac got. Now, the tables have turned. The CTS Sport Wagon is on par, if not better, than the German competition, but the buyer pays for it. Though the Sport Wagon starts at $43,000, our car’s as-tested price topped $52,000, which is actually more than a 3-series or A4 wagon will cost. Will the American public pay more for an American car that is truly built to German standards? Only time and sales figures will tell.
Until then, make my wagon a ‘V.” In Black.











*standing ovation* hahaha someone stole the turtle shell from the engine!!! lol thats why i added a cold air intake to my CTS turned the 306 hp into 326 on a 3.6L V6 seddan (i dont own the wagon) and it also added a nice little growl when passing other cars on the open highway… thanx for reviewing what i believe to be THE BEST CAR I'VE EVER OWNED, I'm now saving $ for the "v"… would you trade your corvette for a brand new 2011 CTS-V BLACK! I would trade my regular CTS and my girlfriend's Nissan Maxima for one in a heart beat
u know ur thinking about it… never say never!
I'll never trade my corvette for anything. But the V wagon is dope.
How was the visibility out back? That D-Pillar is awfully thick. *didn't get Magnum due to poor visibility*
Don't know about the CTS but I have a Magnum and you quickly get used to it.
By the way, I've had it 3 years but only 12k miles and really like it.
In reviewing the CTS here it seems nice and would make a good replacement for the Magnum, which is no longer
available, but the CTS, as the review says, is really pricey.
not great, but not so bad that it would keep me from buying the car. the backup camera helps.
Cool. Great review!
For the record, I'm pretty sure that the Catera was a rebadged Holden Commodore, but other than that I agree with everything you said. Although my only experience behind the wheel of a CTS was a V as well(last generation) I did sit in a new one at the NY autoshow and thought the interior was great. Interestingly, since you bring up your bad knee, the guy sitting in the car when I walked up to it got out and complained that he didn't like it because his knee kept hitting the center console. To my suprise, he had a point. It wasn't super cramped but I do think it could use a bit more room to stretch out being a 5-series size car, which by the way is why I think the 52K price is justified.
I had the same knee hitting problem on a recent rental. It was painful and annoying.
No, the Catera was definitely an Opel, not a Holden. The Commodore was much bigger and powered by a V8.
Turns out the Opel Omega is based on the Holden Commodore, so I guess in a way we're both right.
it's the other way around, the commodores were based on second-gen Omega B's, but enlarged platforms. Either way, point is, the Catera sucked.
the "C" in CTS does not stand for catera *i checked*
Nice car but why the fuck is the D-pillar so FAT? and that rear-side window so small?
ALL the windows need to be bigger, but it's a hot car
Isn't the CTS basically the size of a 5-series rather than a 3-series? If so, think of it as a 5-series at a 3-series price, although a third seat would be nice
I really hope wagons start catching on over here. Been looking for a 3 series sport wagon / a4 avant for a while now. But they are rare, and even harder to find with a manual transmission. They are by far my favorite body style though. Sleek and useful.