Home » News » First Impressions: The New C7 Corvette (finally…) Revealed

First Impressions: The New C7 Corvette (finally…) Revealed

2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray

By Zack Klapman

 

The new Corvette, the C7, is finally here. I don’t mean “finally” the same way a kid arriving at Disneyland after a 12 hour car ride does. I mean it the way you would if you were a bridesmaid at the end of a wedding. For two years you were forced to hear about, discuss, plan, and hypothesize over “the big day”, and now it’s finally over. No more renderings, theories, speculation, sensationalism or stupid forum arm wrestling. This is the car. It’s not mid-engined. It does have that one thing you wanted. It also might not have that other thing you wanted. Such is life.

 

People have asked us what we think about the new car, so I posted my thoughts below. I would like to preface what follows by saying that, to me, no highly-photo shopped photo, no Detroit Auto Show iPhone shot, no picture taken on a stage with 3,000 lights, can accurately portray what a car will look like in person. It won’t have the same impact to my gut, heart, soul as cars do in person. Some cars leap off the page and I love them instantly. Others, like the Venom GT, have to be seen in person to truly appreciate (it looks really god damn good in person). The pictures from GM look like they are from GT5, and the ones from the auto show are so brightly spotted it looks a water balloon filled with White Out burst on the stage.

 

So, I reserve my final judgement until I see it in person. I have no doubt it will be incredible to drive, uphold it’s name’s performance legacy, and kick fucking ass. Right now, I can merely (and barely) judge how it looks.  What follows below is a short comic-book-ish barrage of gut reactions to various angles or pieces of the car; Like flipping through Polaroids that I’ve written comments on.  These are simply the things that stood out in my mind today, looking over this new Corvette.

The Stingray name is back (as is the poetic “LT1″ engine code). I can see the influences in the design: the tapering rear and peaked fenders. But I feel the original Stingray had a simpler design. The new car looks very busy, with the vents here, creases there, more vents, slashes, etc. There’s a lot for the eye to take in. But, being a fan of older cars, and my top design favorites being smoothies like the 550 Maranello and 8C, it’s no surprise I’m not immediately in love.

Again, it may be that these pictures highlight too much at once; more than in real life. I love the edges of the CTS-V, so perhaps in real life, I’ll get it. I do like that tapered rear… and the fenders….

2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray

 

But gills and vents? I’ll probably stand in strong opposition. I don’t care for these on the GTR, or here. I think it’s that they’re so thick, making them more noticeable, and breaking that painted flank. I know I’m not a design student, and these things are done for a reason. This is also probably (hopefully) functional, reducing drag, brake heat, etc. But I would have like to see one without them, just to see what it would have been like. “Slippery” comes to mind.

2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray

Same with these, which I dislike even more. Cooling the brakes or diff? Sure, but there didn’t seem to be a problem with either before. I like pronounced hips on a car, or on anything, really. One of my favorite things about the ZL1 was looking in the side mirror and seeing that big, peaked metal sitting over the tire. Wide, bold, tough. And it was unbroken metal. To me this is like making a bronze sculpture of a seal, smooth, soft, and beautiful. And then bolting a TV to its side and calling it “modern art commentary”.

2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray

The word that comes to mind from the back is “tough.”

Well, I want it to be, except I read a comment online that said it looked like a robot with a uni-brow, smoking 4 cigarettes. Clever. Valid. Burned in my memory forever.

I actually see a little bit of 3rd gen Trans Am, like a Trans Am sent back from the future. Only problem is the front looks like it’s from the present.

But the profile is good. The F/R fenders have great shape,. They remind me of a 599, kind of a surgical athleticism. Sexy but lethal, like James Bond.

Perhaps it’s the color that’s thrown me. Color can change everything…

2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray

…red is good.2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray

Let’s move on to the interior before I’m completely crucified:

“Wow, Ralph Gilles and the rest of the Viper guys must be pissed someone traced their- oh shit, is this thing on?”

Jokes aside, it’s a marked improvement from that last two generations, which-in my opinion-saw negligible changes between C5 and C6, especially when compared to the evolution of the performance.

 

Updated? Yes. Better looking? Absolutely. Less black plastic is a great thing, as are buttons from this decade. I like the contrasting colors, and the placement of them. In the past, Corvette interiors looked like endless mesas of black and grey plastic. This has some style, some flavor, some character going on. There’s more shapes and panels, and that is a good thing.

2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray

 

 

NEWWWWWW SEEEEEEEEEEEATSSSSS!!! YESSSSSSSSSS. OHHHH THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU.

2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray

If they feel as good as they look, we should be very, very happy.

The front: I’ve seen some jokes made about it being a wee bit too close to the Viper. Well, I understand: the headlights sweep up along the fender, like the Viper, rather than spreading across the nose like the C6. The mouth is also much taller than the past Vettes, a trait the Viper also possesses. I do see what they’re talking about. But Ferrari also did that a while ago with the 430 (the headlights taken-in my opinion- to the extreme with the 458), the 599, and the 612. In fact, the Corvette is more similar to the new Ferrari F70 than the Viper. Swept-back lights are the just current trend.

Looking at the two of them head-on, there’s a lot of similarities. But step one foot in either direction, and you’ll see the Corvette’s lights sweep farther back. Side by side, the two don’t look as related. Less Alec/Steven Baldwin, more Jake/Maggie Gyllenhaal. The Corvette and Viper look just as similar now as they did in 2008.

2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray

Dunno whose idea it was to render it with blue fire and eating blue ghosts, but I like it.

That’s it. My reaction to the new C7 Corvette. Matt’s opinion will likely differ, and I know we’ll all discuss it on the podcast later this week. For now, flame me here, or take it to the forum.

 

 

Source: General Motors

 

Follow us on Twitter: @thesmokingtire @zackklapman


  • MixiN

    I think your comments were horrificly and utterly…. accurate. Spot on. Except for the rear, which i thinks want to pay an homage to the corvair. But ends up looking like a sporting malibu. Im sure its a great drive but someone better release a de-ricing bodykit soon to clean up the mess.

    • MixiN

      Dat spelling and grammar in my comment

  • smikey

    The angle of the center stack reminds me of a Cadillac Allante's.

  • Bimmer

    I can deal with the extra vents as long as they're functional and help keep the temps down on long track days.

    BTW, the link to the forum is broken…

    • TheSmokingTire

      Crap. Thanks. Fixed.

  • MixiN

    Spot on comments, love the vette. But dat ass looks like the cheap hooker that got some cash and went out to buy some clothes. Kinda hot at first glance but tacky and cheap lookin once u get up close.

  • Wickedsc300

    Pretty much agree with you. I think its a little to busy and all those vents are not need, just look at the 458 not a single vent on it and the diff and brakes work fine. Also, don't like how far forward the door is painted on the roof. The interior looks nicer but that does not mean it is, see the new viper interior reviews, will have to wait till some of you guys get your hands on it to find out.

  • Eric

    I can't wait to see a video review of this from The Smoking Tire!

  • exoticagenda

    Simple line can have strength and elegance the Euros have been doing it for ever. It seems the only elements that work are the areas GM has "borrowed",when left to themselves they come up with that rear end!, 80's meets Flash Gordon plus quad chrome pipes.The Corvette has been fighting the stigma of a "cheap looking car" for years ,performance has never been an issue.It needs a world class interior and fewer cooks in the design kitchen.

  • Sam

    Everyone seems to be complaining that the top of the room isn't all blacked out, I feel like they're going to save that for the zo6 or whatever they will call it.

  • http://Whomakescheesedavemakessomemotherfuckincheese.org Dave The Cheese Maker

    I can’t get past the parts bin design that seems to have happened here. The side LEDs on the headlights are Ferrari, the side vent and windows are GT-R, the rear end is Camaro, the rear haunch vents are F12, and the Viper echo is loud as he’ll over the entire thing. I just don’t get it. It’s overly aggressive and almost tuner-like. Not an evolution in my eyes.

    • Michael Bailey

      Your comments are as original as your feelings on the C7′s looks. Been there and heard that already. Have you seen the new Vette in person? No, you haven’t. Nor have I. So before you make such a judgement, maybe you should actually SEE the product.

  • Miller

    Not a single vent on the 458? Are you sure you are looking at the right car?

    • TheSmokingTire

      The vents on the 458 are much more subtle, and not announced with giant plastic pieces of flare that say, "There's a vent here! See it!?"

  • Anonymous

    Looks like its been styled with aftermarket tuning parts in an old need for speed game by some kid. The rear is just horrible

  • Thomas

    That's one ugly rear end. Uni-brow robot is spot on description. The four tailpipe dare I say look ricer.

  • Martin

    I've noticed that the rear-end of cars, especially sports coupes, seem to be getting larger, and thicker, whereas the original stingray has a more tapered look on both ends. I think from a design standpoint, they deal with this well, but it seems to make all cars look roughly the same, so someone please educate me, does this have to do with safety regulations? Aerodynamics? Downforce? Help a brother out.

    I like the vette. I think the breaks in the design created by the vents gives it a purposeful look, and I don't think the chiseled edges would look as good without them, I'd be willing to eat crow if someone rendered a vent-less version. I would have driven a C5 around a C6 and not been too upset, but I'd be hard-pressed to want a C6 after seeing a C7.

  • 4armo

    Compared to the rest of the designs GM/Chev is putting out there, its a miracle it looks this good. The avoidance of a complete disaster is a huge victory in itself. Great front end, nice interior, awesome tech, 450hp small block and a meh back end… 4/5 ain't bad. All that for 55K? They will sell these all day long.

  • DRTYBRD

    The phrase "AUTOBOTS ROLLOUT! comes to mind, but that seems to be the design language of todays auto makers.

  • thewisegoat

    I like the front, I like the sides. The back, however, looks like the bastard love child of a Pontiac Aztek, the Camaro, and an ice scraper.

  • Laconiajack

    Looks like it was designed by a committee of sixth graders, who didn't know when to stop. They threw in every thing they could think of. The beauty of the C6 coupe was its elegent, streamlined, functional simplicity.